In 2006, a group of investors set out six principles for responsible investment, which means incorporating Environmental, Social and corporate Governance (ESG) issues in all their decisions. By taking into account how companies interact with all their stakeholders and their environment, these investors started building a more sustainable financial system.
ESG: the sustainability indicator that sees through the window-dressingHeralded as a 'new lens' into a company's performance and work culture, ESG metrics (Environmental, Social and Governance) are attracting attention among investors.
ESG data measure how well a company is performing as a steward of the natural environment, in its relationships with staff, suppliers, customers and the wider community, and in the way it is led.
Many investors now recognise that ESG factors can affect the performance of their investments, both in terms of risks and returns, amid evidence showing that companies with strong ESG scores can deliver better financial returns. ESG data can also highlight potential risks such as those related to climate change.
Another factor is that the millennial generation is more demanding in wanting to know that their investments are responsibly sourced and are not contributing to climate change or supporting corrupt governments.
Investment strategiesThe United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment, agreed by 100 investors in 2006, provide a framework that investors can use to incorporate ESG into their decision-making and ownership practices.
The number of signatories to the principles has grown strongly over the past ten years, and now stands at more than 1,500, including 300 institutional investors.
Governments, regulators and ratings agencies are also putting increasing emphasis on ESG reporting.
In December 2015 France became the first country in the world to adopt a law requiring large institutional investors to disclose information about the way they manage climate risk and how they integrate ESG into their investment strategies.
Meanwhile, the European Union has agreed a directive on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information that will require large companies to report ESG data.
And in May, Standard & Poor's, Moody's and four other ratings agencies announced that they would start including ESG risks in their assessments.
Positive practicesESG requirements are now increasingly being written into investment and lending agreements, and companies are producing more data to allow potential investors to screen them for ESG factors.
Companies themselves may also insist that their suppliers respect their own standards, with the result that positive practices spread through the supply chain.
ESG measurements cover an extremely wide range of topics. In terms of environment, issues include carbon emissions, energy use, raw material sourcing and recycling. The social component embraces human rights, employee relations, diversity issues, and health and safety. And the governance segment looks at factors such as executive pay, board structure, shareholder rights, and bribery and corruption.
There is therefore a need for accurate, consistent and independent data on a whole range of questions. And investors need sophisticated analytical tools to enable them to integrate ESG into their investment strategies.
Why is it important for companies to pay attention to ESG?André Chanavat: If you're a large cap company, you need to have some pretty good reporting on ESG fields and metrics. It opens up new capital flows in terms of potential shareholders. It's not just about being perceived as a very good corporate citizen. It can also attract new capital flows. It's also about operational efficiencies. There are companies that want to look at sustainability, not as just a window-dressing exercise, but to understand where they can improve in terms of energy efficiency or maximising the happiness of their workforce.
Is it being driven by demand from investors or pressure from governments or customers?It's a combination of things. The investment community are under pressure from asset owners to integrate ESG as a criterion in their investment decision-making process. We can't ignore the regulatory landscape which has seen tremendous change. And if you are a large cap company, you want to meet all the standards that are out there and that's another stimulus for transparency
Tell us about the data you collect and produce at Thomson Reuters.For our ESG database we look at the annual report, corporate social responsibility report, company website and relevant filings. We cover over 5,000 publicly listed companies and we provide over 400 measures for each company within that universe. This goes back to fiscal year 2002, so we have been collecting this ESG data for quite a long time.
We also have other databases that are relevant to ESG. For governance, for example, officers' and directors' information is important. If you want to know about the board's gender or cultural diversity, or the diversity of age in the boardroom, we have a separate officers and directors database. This covers every publicly listed company out there, so over 65,000 companies. We also monitor all issuers of green bonds.
We have trained over 150 content research analysts spread about various regional content operation centres. They know their industries inside out. They get alerted to when the ESG data become available and then start to process the 400+ measures that we look at. The analysts carefully process the data and then make sure that the final output is standardised. We provide overall ESG scores and scores for the components.
Are others doing similar work and is there any sort of common standard emerging?The ESG data vending space is quite niche. Obviously it's not easy data to collect. There are a handful of pure play ESG data providers today and their approach probably differs in the way they normalise or maybe because of the underlying data itself.
The reporting of ESG has improved massively over the years but it's still in its adolescence really. We're still making strides to improve the meaningfulness of scores and the data. Everyone's moving in the right direction, but it's all going to take time.